AlphaGen
Access AlphaGen
Company Narratives

Berger Paints Q3 FY2026: Gross-Margin Recovery Meets a Working-Capital Drag

Berger Paints improved gross margin sharply in Q3 FY2026, but higher operating costs and weaker cash conversion limited the benefit to earnings.

Sep 19, 2026BERGShare price, results & dividends

Company Name: Berger Paints Pakistan Limited

Ticker: BERG

Reporting period: nine months ended 31 March 2026, including the three months ended 31 March 2026. Primary analytical basis: Berger Paints Pakistan Limited’s unaudited consolidated condensed interim financial statements. The report also contains unaudited unconsolidated company statements; PSX’s headline quarterly table and the directors’ review largely reflect the company-level figures, so small differences in PAT and EPS are explicitly separated below.

Verdict

Berger Paints delivered a better manufacturing margin in the first nine months of FY2026, but that improvement was absorbed by a much heavier selling and administrative cost base. Consolidated revenue increased only 1.7% year on year to Rs6.872 billion, yet gross profit rose 13.4% to Rs1.586 billion and gross margin expanded by about 238 basis points to 23.1%. Despite that, operating profit slipped 2.4% to Rs472.4 million because operating expenses grew more than 21%.

The quarter itself showed the same tension in sharper form. Q3 revenue rose just 1.3%, while gross profit increased 18.2% and gross margin widened by roughly 339 basis points to 23.7%. But selling, administrative and other operating expenses rose 24.3%, limiting operating-profit growth to 5.8%. Below operating profit, lower other income meant Q3 consolidated PAT fell 4.5% to Rs66.5 million even as the core gross margin improved.

The positive part is that the margin recovery is visible in reported cost of sales, not in a large one-off gain. Management says nine-month sales growth was primarily volume-led and attributes the stronger gross profit to a more favorable product mix, stable cost structures, better operating effectiveness and cost optimization. Those are management explanations, not independently decomposed drivers, because the filing does not provide product-level volumes, prices or margins. The next test is whether Berger can keep the gross-margin improvement while slowing the growth in selling costs and restoring stronger cash conversion.

Results at a glance

  • Nine-month consolidated revenue increased 1.7% to Rs6.872 billion from Rs6.760 billion. Q3 revenue increased 1.3% to Rs2.171 billion.
  • Nine-month gross profit increased 13.4% to Rs1.586 billion and gross margin improved to 23.1% from 20.7%, an expansion of about 238 basis points.
  • Q3 gross profit rose 18.2% to Rs514.6 million; Q3 gross margin improved to 23.7% from 20.3%, an expansion of about 339 basis points.
  • Nine-month operating expenses rose 21.7% to Rs1.114 billion, driven by a 22.4% rise in selling and distribution expense, a 14.5% rise in administrative expense and a 47.4% rise in other operating expense.
  • Nine-month operating profit fell 2.4% to Rs472.4 million. Q3 operating profit rose 5.8% to Rs152.0 million.
  • Finance cost declined 25.9% over nine months to Rs129.7 million, helping PBT rise 7.6% to Rs397.7 million.
  • Nine-month consolidated PAT increased 3.5% to Rs240.8 million and EPS attributable to equity holders rose to Rs9.81 from Rs9.48. Q3 PAT fell 4.5% to Rs66.5 million and EPS fell to Rs2.71 from Rs2.84.
  • Operating cash flow fell 55.1% to Rs159.1 million from Rs354.2 million. Trade receivables and inventory increased from June 2025, while short-term borrowings rose to Rs1.460 billion.

AlphaGen model readings

  • Alpha QoQ Score: 18.58
  • TTM Performance Score: 64.25
  • 3Y Business Perf Score: 79.30
  • Sector Leadership Score: 44.66

These four readings are AlphaGen model outputs, not company-reported figures.

What improved

The most important improvement was gross economics. Cost of sales fell slightly even as revenue increased, lifting nine-month gross margin to 23.1% from 20.7%. In Q3, cost of sales fell about 3.0% year on year while revenue rose 1.3%, which widened gross margin to 23.7%. That is a materially better conversion of revenue into gross profit than in the comparable period.

Management says the nine-month revenue increase was primarily driven by improved sales volume and attributes the gross-profit improvement to a better product mix, stable cost structures, improved operating effectiveness and continued cost optimization. The public accounts do not quantify the contribution of each factor, so it would be too strong to say that pricing, raw-material deflation or any single product category drove the margin expansion. What can be verified is that the accounting cost-of-sales ratio improved substantially.

Finance cost was another clear positive. Consolidated nine-month finance cost fell to Rs129.7 million from Rs174.9 million, a 25.9% reduction, while Q3 finance cost fell 6.3%. Berger’s directors cite prudent financial management and relatively stable bank rates. The macro backdrop supports the direction: SBP kept the policy rate at 10.5% through the March 9, 2026 meeting, below the rates prevailing during much of the prior comparable period.

What weakened / needs attention

The largest weakness is that Berger spent much of the gross-profit gain below the gross-profit line. Selling and distribution expense increased to Rs867.4 million from Rs708.9 million over nine months, a 22.4% increase on only 1.7% revenue growth. Administrative expense rose 14.5% and other operating expense rose 47.4%. As a result, operating margin eased to about 6.87% from 7.16% even though gross margin improved by more than two percentage points.

The Q3 pattern is similar. Gross profit increased by Rs79.1 million year on year, but operating expenses increased by about Rs70.8 million. This left operating profit only Rs8.3 million higher. Berger therefore needs to demonstrate that the higher sales-and-marketing intensity can generate stronger revenue growth or that expense growth can normalize. The current filing does not provide customer-acquisition metrics, dealer productivity or campaign-level returns, so no such payoff should be assumed.

Below operating profit, Q3 was weaker. Other income fell from Rs20.3 million to Rs6.9 million, more than offsetting part of the operating improvement. PBT declined 3.1% to Rs114.4 million and PAT fell 4.5% to Rs66.5 million. The nine-month picture remained positive because finance-cost savings were larger: PBT rose 7.6%, though the tax charge rose 14.5% and the effective tax rate increased to about 39.5% from 37.1%, limiting PAT growth to 3.5%.

The company-level headline is slightly stronger than the consolidated result. The unaudited unconsolidated statements show nine-month PAT of Rs245.5 million and EPS of Rs10.00, versus Rs232.8 million and Rs9.48 a year earlier. The consolidated statements show PAT of Rs240.8 million and EPS of Rs9.81 because they incorporate the equity-accounted investee and non-controlling interests. AlphaGen uses the consolidated group basis for the main analysis and does not mix the two bases.

Recurring earnings versus exceptional items

The March result does not appear to depend on a large exceptional gain. Other income was broadly stable over nine months at Rs59.5 million versus Rs60.9 million, while Q3 other income actually fell sharply. The share of loss from the equity-accounted investee was Rs4.6 million for nine months, small relative to operating profit but worse than the near-zero loss in the prior period.

That makes the gross-margin improvement more relevant than it would be if profit had been driven by a disposal or fair-value gain. At the same time, it should not be overstated as a full earnings breakthrough because selling and distribution costs rose faster than gross profit and operating profit declined over the nine-month period. The recurring earnings question is therefore about expense discipline and cash conversion, not stripping out a dominant one-off.

The consolidated equity statement records a Rs122.8 million final cash dividend for FY2025 as a transaction with owners during the period, while the cash-flow statement records Rs128.3 million of dividend payments over the nine months. Those amounts should be read as shareholder distributions arising from prior approval, not as operating earnings or a Q3 profit driver.

Cash flow, working capital and balance sheet

Cash conversion weakened materially. Net cash generated from operating activities fell to Rs159.1 million from Rs354.2 million even though profit before working-capital changes increased to Rs831.0 million from Rs714.8 million. The main issue was working capital: trade debts absorbed Rs338.0 million versus Rs144.3 million a year earlier, and the cash benefit from higher trade and other payables was only Rs95.7 million versus Rs670.0 million in the comparable period. Taxes paid also increased to Rs238.6 million.

At 31 March 2026, consolidated trade debts were Rs3.013 billion, up 8.2% from June 2025, and stock-in-trade was Rs1.619 billion, up 5.1%. Cash and bank balances fell 9.8% from June to Rs267.5 million. Current assets rose 4.9%, but current liabilities rose 7.0%, pushing the current ratio down to about 1.42x from 1.45x. Liquidity remains above 1x, but the direction reinforces the need to monitor receivable collection and inventory discipline.

Short-term borrowings increased 21.5% from June to Rs1.460 billion, while long-term financing was Rs189.5 million and the current portion of deferred income was Rs139.1 million. The nine-month cash-flow statement shows Rs258.1 million of net short-term borrowing inflow. In other words, lower finance expense is welcome, but the company was using more short-term funding by March. If policy rates or imported-input costs rise, the benefit from FY2026 financing relief could become harder to sustain.

Sector and end-market context

Berger operates across decorative paints, automotive coatings, industrial finishes, powder coatings, protective coatings, vehicle refinishes, road safety and construction-related products. That breadth means no single macro indicator can explain the quarter. Still, external data show that the industrial backdrop was supportive rather than uniformly weak: PBS reported overall large-scale manufacturing growth of 6.48% in July–March FY2026.

The automotive end-market strengthened sharply. PAMA data show cumulative passenger-car sales of 109,655 units in July–March FY2026 versus 75,397 units in the comparable period, an increase of about 45%. Berger does not disclose how much Q3 revenue came from automotive coatings, so this cannot be treated as the cause of its 1.3% quarterly sales growth. It does, however, indicate that one material industrial end-market was much healthier than a year earlier.

Management also flagged the Middle East conflict and Strait of Hormuz tensions as risks to oil prices, freight and trade. SBP’s March 9 statement independently noted a sharp increase in global fuel prices, freight and insurance costs after the outbreak of war in the Middle East. This matters for a coatings producer because supply-chain and energy shocks can pressure imported or petrochemical-linked inputs, but the Berger filing does not quantify its raw-material import share or commodity sensitivities. Any direct earnings impact beyond management’s warning would therefore be inference.

Historical pattern

FY2025 had already shown a business with modest top-line growth but improving profitability: the company’s audited annual report reported unconsolidated sales of Rs8.945 billion and PAT of Rs298.5 million, versus Rs8.544 billion and Rs262.9 million in FY2024. The March 2026 result continues the margin-improvement theme at the gross-profit level, but the expense build means that the operating-profit trend is less clean.

The nine-month result also shows why margin structure matters more than headline sales growth for Berger at this stage. Revenue growth is low single digit, yet a roughly 238-basis-point gross-margin improvement created nearly Rs187 million of additional gross profit. Almost all of that was then absorbed by higher operating expenses. A durable improvement would require Berger either to convert its marketing spend into faster sales growth or to hold gross margin while expense growth slows.

What to monitor next

  • Gross-margin durability: whether the 23%+ gross margin can be maintained once the current product mix, input costs and supply-chain conditions change.
  • Selling and distribution productivity: revenue needs to respond to a cost line that grew more than 22% over nine months.
  • Receivable collection: trade debts increased to more than Rs3.0 billion and were the largest working-capital cash drain in the nine-month cash flow.
  • Short-term borrowing: track whether the March increase reverses or becomes a structural funding requirement.
  • Middle East and input-cost exposure: SBP raised the policy rate to 11.5% effective 28 April 2026 after the reporting period as energy, freight, insurance and supply-chain risks intensified. The next result will be the first to show more of that environment.
  • End-market mix: stronger auto production and sales are supportive context, but Berger needs segment or product disclosure before investors can distinguish decorative, automotive, industrial and project-related growth.
  • Operating leverage: the key test is whether higher gross profit begins to translate into faster operating-profit growth instead of being absorbed by overhead and distribution spending.

Bottom line

Berger Paints’ Q3 FY2026 result is best described as a margin recovery with incomplete earnings conversion. The company generated substantially more gross profit from almost flat sales, finance cost fell and the quarter produced modest operating-profit growth. There is no obvious large exceptional gain propping up the result. Those are meaningful positives.

But the nine-month operating result did not grow because selling and administrative costs rose much faster than revenue, and operating cash flow fell by more than half as receivables consumed more cash and the prior-year payable benefit did not repeat. The next cycle therefore has two clear tests: protect the better gross margin and make the improvement show up in operating profit and cash flow. With post-period macro risks around energy, freight and interest rates rising, execution on working capital and cost discipline matters as much as volume growth.

Sources

Explore more research

All articles